tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post116524668294983946..comments2024-02-11T02:24:22.330-06:00Comments on Nonbovine Ruminations: The ArbCom electionsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04107127399494404366noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1167041283263658272006-12-25T04:08:00.000-06:002006-12-25T04:08:00.000-06:00It is my considered opinion that a person who will...<I>It is my considered opinion that a person who will stoop to misrepresentation because the truth is inconvenient is not the sort of person who should be serving on the Arbitration Committee. Neither is someone who would brazenly assume bad faith of another Wikipedian</I><BR/><BR/>Congrats Kell, you've just disqualified yourself.<BR/>Merry X-Mas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165827389218487522006-12-11T02:56:00.000-06:002006-12-11T02:56:00.000-06:00Hey Kelly, I hesitate to point this out, since any...Hey Kelly, I hesitate to point this out, since any intelligent person would notice is immediately, but have you noticed - when you make constructive observations and suggestions you get positive feedback. On the other hand, when you make savage attacks on individuals behind their back you get the same in return.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165788515959993182006-12-10T16:08:00.000-06:002006-12-10T16:08:00.000-06:00As I understand it, the average age of a registere...As I understand it, the average age of a registered Wikipedia user is what, 26?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165603602444908532006-12-08T12:46:00.000-06:002006-12-08T12:46:00.000-06:00You are not going to win any election, because peo...You are not going to win any election, because people do not believe a word you say. You were an arrogant, abusive, dissembling and cliquish administrator for so long, that it defies belief that you have changed.<BR/><BR/>If you are in fact genuine in some of your recent statements, then it must be painful to have them rebuffed. But you must accept that when you state that you stand for "a zero tolerance policy for administrative misconduct" people are just going to laugh at the irony.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165534004928825352006-12-07T17:26:00.000-06:002006-12-07T17:26:00.000-06:00WP is vastly overrated as a social experiment.Kell...WP is vastly overrated as a social experiment.<BR/><BR/>Kelly's just another of the poor dummies that got sucked in by the project, tasted a little of the so-called power in the project, flamed out and now craves more of the same. She's hooked and can't cut bait. A WP junkie.<BR/><BR/>Castles in the sand.<BR/><BR/>People, you're all wasting valuable time. WP don't mean shit. Just chewing you up and spitting you out. Its power is 100-per-cent illusory to everyone but dysfunctional, lonely computer-and- knowledge geeks that can't get laid.<BR/><BR/>Move on to paid work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165487072538293172006-12-07T04:24:00.000-06:002006-12-07T04:24:00.000-06:00Hey Kelly, here's and idea: go to some web communi...Hey Kelly, here's and idea: go to some web community and insult people; start fights; engage in politics and social climbing; engage in character assignations; bait people; help your friends and harm your enemies, as long as it's good for you and regardless of whether it's bad for the community; suck up to anyone with power and piss on anyone who is down and out - basically, just be a social whore; fuck the truth - weave rationalizations that promote yourself; adopt a completely unjustified sense of self-importance; do incalculable harm to the culture of the project with your childish, petty behavior. And don't contribute anything of value. Then ask publicly for feed back on your activities. Pretty cool idea, huh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165380575338571622006-12-05T22:49:00.000-06:002006-12-05T22:49:00.000-06:00Hey Kelly, just wanted to remind you; there is not...Hey Kelly, just wanted to remind you; there is nothing wrong with sockpuppets, as long as they behave. However, if you misuse them you could be banned from wikipedia. An example would be casting multiple votes on the arbcom election. CheersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165333887305347072006-12-05T09:51:00.000-06:002006-12-05T09:51:00.000-06:00Yes, we understand what you're saying Kelly; you'...Yes, we understand what you're saying Kelly; you're right and the rest of the world is wrong. <BR/><BR/>You just keep telling that to yourself, over and over and over again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165324594324320392006-12-05T07:16:00.000-06:002006-12-05T07:16:00.000-06:00If people should be disgusted at anyone, it should...If people should be disgusted at anyone, it should be Geogre. Anyone who is disgusted at me for being disgusted and righteously angry at Geogre for repeatedly lying about me and others, is someone whose opinion I do not care about. <BR/><BR/>I will not accept a liar in order to gain popular acceptance. There is no excuse for supporting such an unethical and immoral individual as Geogre for any position of responsibility, and I will not brook arguments to the contrary, as anyone who makes them is clearly morally bankrupt themselves.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04107127399494404366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1165324135486042642006-12-05T07:08:00.000-06:002006-12-05T07:08:00.000-06:00Kelly, this is just a huge load of vitriole. The l...Kelly, this is just a huge load of vitriole. The level of insults, negative campaigning and ad hominem attacks on another candidate only serves to disgust people. Making wide statements like what you did about support for Geogre's candidacy serves only to insult swathes of good-faith volunteer contributors who may have a different view than you.<BR/><BR/>Posts and statements like this blog entry explain why you are currently running at a lower support than Everyking got in January. It is this attitude which explains why a number of users lost faith in you during 2006 and turned towards you with hostility rather than openness. It is <I>your</I> conduct which explains why a number of users who strongly supported your ArbCom re-election in January have turned to strongly opposing it.<BR/><BR/>Kelly, you were such a fine contributor in 2005 with many excellent and useful contributions to the encyclopedia. Why are you doing this to yourself?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com