tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post117268010134838487..comments2024-02-11T02:24:22.330-06:00Comments on Nonbovine Ruminations: RedtapeopediaAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04107127399494404366noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-38601296055867052162007-08-12T21:21:00.000-05:002007-08-12T21:21:00.000-05:00Wikipedia is not nomic.Well I'm glad to hear that....<I>Wikipedia is not nomic.</I><BR/><BR/>Well I'm glad to hear that. My nomic days are long past. Though I never really got into editing Wikipedia either; I will make some minor fixes on occasion, but that's all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-1172726119675859012007-02-28T23:15:00.000-06:002007-02-28T23:15:00.000-06:00Here is a suggestion. In order to vote on a deleti...Here is a suggestion. In order to vote on a deletion or deletion review, the editor must have created xx amount of encyclopedic content in the last month. Or, better yet, the people who don't create anything, but just hang out on irc an bitch and moan should be shown the door.<BR/><BR/>People who actually create content at wikipedia tend to be more mature and intelligent. Of course there are exceptions, but someone who doesn't create content has no business voting on deleting content. <BR/><BR/>I'm not sure if you know how it feels, Kelly, to work hard building the encyclopedia, only to watch people who don't contribute - pompous bombasts with an undeserved sense of self-importance - swaggering around like they own the place.<BR/><BR/>Get rid of these people and let the writers run afd, or whatever the fuck it's called nowadays, and things would go much better.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com