tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post6260765716245087953..comments2024-02-11T02:24:22.330-06:00Comments on Nonbovine Ruminations: Much Furor about SlimVirginAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04107127399494404366noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-9352401224809724332010-05-31T08:28:34.034-05:002010-05-31T08:28:34.034-05:00The above Animal Rights Editing Conspiracy post ha...The above Animal Rights Editing Conspiracy post has long since been exposed as a hoax. On the other hand, despite all the totally legitimate exposes of SlimVirgin's misconduct, she is still active as a Wikipedia admin, controlling content on the articles she wishes to dominate. Go figure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-82479419065134012822007-08-24T09:51:00.000-05:002007-08-24T09:51:00.000-05:00Need evidence of Slimvirgin's abuse?Here are her o...Need evidence of Slimvirgin's abuse?<BR/><BR/>Here are her own words:<BR/>http://animalrights.meetup.com/<BR/>boards/view/viewthread?thread=3075391<BR/><BR/><I>If you don't already help out at Wikipedia that's a great place to meet up. We have controlled animal rights articles there for several years, but the project is always expanding and we always need people to make sure new peripheral articles are slanted our way.</I><BR/><BR/><I>If you come over, just start commenting on any animal rights article and we will gladly recognize an ally. Branch out, contribute to a few unrelated topics, make a few spelling corrections, participate in the community discussions and when you have 1,000 edits or more, one of us will nominate you for administrator. That's where the real fun starts. We routinely block anyone who could pose a serious challenge to our control of animal rights articles. Once you're an admin, we'll sign you onto our list and give you the inside scoop on our latest campaigns.</I><BR/><BR/><I>Wikipedia -- we own it!!!</I><BR/><BR/>What ever happened to Wikipedia's neutrality?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-5101882556966384972007-08-05T23:11:00.000-05:002007-08-05T23:11:00.000-05:00Sarah's not a spy but she should surrender Slim Vi...Sarah's not a spy but she should surrender Slim Virgin. It's tough though, isn't it? Tough to stop being a figure when you have been one. You should understand that, Kelly.<BR/><BR/>"I'm not ready to burn that bridge quite yet." LOL. I'll bet you're not.Dr Zenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14447633362204112316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-41745985995509649052007-08-01T22:19:00.000-05:002007-08-01T22:19:00.000-05:00Alternative explanation to Slimv oversights:Slimv ...Alternative explanation to Slimv oversights:<BR/><BR/>Slimv is the pen name she used to write a porn story. This porn story featured a woman who had a small penis, its a rare medical condition. <A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/20041031221755/http://www.sapphireplace.com/stories/slimv/doubledate4.html" REL="nofollow">The story is available here online.</A><BR/><BR/>A female who develops a penis would have been exposed to lots of testosterone and not much estrogen thus resulting in a slim hip profile as well as being somewhat flat. That person may also end up being a virgin because of apprehension about sexual intercourse, most people are worried enough about their first time just being regular old folk.<BR/><BR/>The SlimVirgin name is extremely meaninful in the context of her life, if this theory is true.<BR/><BR/>This hypothesis also explains to other strange events. First, SlimV name, whose contributions were all oversighted, tied her to the sexual story that revealed a lot of information. Second, her edits to the Pan Am 103 bombing tied the name to her identity. Both of these were oversighted in order to allow SlimVirgin to keep her sexual secret.<BR/><BR/>The truth of the matter is that this is all about SlimVirgin sexual issue, its not about spying or cover ups at all.<BR/><BR/>I think it makes more sense than I ever expected.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-75830734124414711012007-07-31T23:42:00.000-05:002007-07-31T23:42:00.000-05:00I googled and found this[0]. If these people are c...I googled and found this[0]. If these people are controlling access to certain pages to supposedly distort infomation and using the power structure of wikipedia to remove rivals, is there a way to remove these people access to the pages that they seek to distort, which may only be a temporary measure as there can be anonymous editing or a new user account for these folks. Wikipedia does not want Jeff Bezos to edit pages on Amazon, is this not similar?<BR/><BR/><BR/>[0]http://antisocialmedia.net/?p=28Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-90270544688154308142007-07-31T20:05:00.000-05:002007-07-31T20:05:00.000-05:00Andrew Blum JayjgLinda Mack SlimvirginThe quasi-an...Andrew Blum Jayjg<BR/>Linda Mack Slimvirgin<BR/><BR/>The quasi-anonymous stalwart flagbearers of the Straussian Rump Rogering Society.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-35112443901347914172007-07-31T09:01:00.000-05:002007-07-31T09:01:00.000-05:00Kelly, do you have any idea why Jimbo Wales suppor...Kelly, do you have any idea why Jimbo Wales supports Jayjg so thoroughly, in spite of the latter's blatant propagandizing? From the sidelines, I can only believe that either cash or bodily fluids have been exchanged ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-71599725635600077492007-07-31T06:32:00.000-05:002007-07-31T06:32:00.000-05:00I'm not sure how the Wikipedia Clique can ban stuf...I'm not sure how the Wikipedia Clique can ban stuff from somebody else's blog... though they <I>can</I> declare it to be an Attack Site.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17724373978066396316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33573016.post-43646422030016408192007-07-30T23:09:00.000-05:002007-07-30T23:09:00.000-05:00Wonderful post, Kelly Martin! I hope that they do...Wonderful post, Kelly Martin! I hope that they don't delete this too!<BR/><BR/>You are exactly right, that when people start deleting things (and check out SlimVirgin's talk page deletions, and blocking of anyone who dared to ask her about the recent scandal), that people become far more suspicious than before. Combine this with SlimVirgin effectively owning virtually every policy page in relation to anyone ever finding out her identity, her conflict of interest, or her changing history (such things as WP:V) and you get a seriously dangerous individual. The most dangerous thing that Wikipedia can do is to change truth. Simply abuse by administrators doesn't matter much. In SlimVirgin we have someone who not only seems to be changing truth, but doing it with a covert agenda. IMO SlimVirgin, Crum375, Jayjg, and anyone else affiliated with that line of editing should be banned from Wikipedia if Wikipedia is to have any chance of ever being respected again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com