So, this past week the Sci Fi Channel recently changed its name to the just atrociously misspelled name of "Syfy" Channel. The ostensible reason? Apparently there's this nagging feeling at NBC Universal (who owns the Sci Fi Channel) that the name "Sci Fi" is holding them back, because that term is associated with nerds in basements and such not. The alternate spelling of "Syfy" is supposed to be more appealing to women.
Well, ok, whatever. They sound the same and for most people that's going to evoke the same feeling. Won't affect my tendency to watch their channel: I have almost no idea what channel anything in particular is on because I have been a TiVo user now for almost ten years. I just tell my TiVo what to record and it finds it and records it whatever channel it's on. (Besides, I watch maybe three hours of TV a week these days.)
That said, I miss the old Sci Fi channel, in the days before the new Battlestar Galactica (which I detest). They used to have much more science-fictiony content, but lately've they've definitely moved much closer to the mainstream perception of "sci-fi", such as the new BG. Frankly "Lost" is more science-fictiony than BG. So while I do occasionally watch some of their content, it's not often, and I don't seek it out.
Still, the real reason they changed their name? Branding. You can't trademark "sci fi" as a universal mark; it's a common phrase and trademark protection in common phrases is always limited in scope. But "Syfy" isn't a common phrase or term, and so the trademark they can get for that is exclusive; this gives them a much more powerful trademark and much broader branding opportunities. (This is why so many products have deliberately misspelled names.) That, dear friends, is the real reason for the name change.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm not sure why you're picking on Battlestar Galactica. It was the best sci-fi on television since Firefly. Few shows on television these days do qualify as proper sci-fi, so I'm wondering under what qualifications you're disqualifying it when, as far as I can tell, it's was the most sci-fi-ish thing on TV in years.
ReplyDeleteAnd no, I haven't seen Lost, but from what I've heard of it, it's more along the lines of horror/mystery/psychological thriller. Thus I wouldn't really classify it as sci-fi, although it is in the same general vicinity.
I never heard the "scifi sounds too nerdy" excuse. The only reason I recall seeing given was that they couldn't trademark a common word.
ReplyDeleteAnd hey, wait a second. Syfy airs Doctor Who! Definite points for that.
I'm with you on no science in syfy (sounds like an Indian ISP).
ReplyDeleteI never did see how horror movies were classified as sci fi except maybe how science scares people that don't understand -- but that's not why I watch, to get scared.
I watch(ed) both Lost and BSG and while they are (were) both excellent, BSG is a much better show and sci fi drama.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand what NBC hopes to achieve by changing the spelling...the programming is the same.